The only comment I would make is again to bear in mind the enormous variance in fact patterns. I have seen files, for example, where the offender relocated to the United States, potentially for a fairly brief time, and in fact committed an offence in the United States against a family member and was incarcerated in the United States for that offence. The family has become estranged from the offender and has moved back to Canada.
So there's a situation where, indeed, the victim is not someone in the United States. In fact, it's a family member who is back in Canada and who came back for the specific reason of wanting to put some distance between themselves and the offender. I simply raise that again just to emphasize there's a wide variety of fact patterns.