I'm just waiting for the conversation on the other side to quiet down.
First of all, thank you very much for being here. Your views are important to us.
I'm looking at this from the point of view of the victims involved in crime, and frankly, I think our government is too, in terms of putting this forward. Because it does expand the powers of the minister to make determinations on what I would think would sometimes be a common sense basis, from the point of view of people who could be or would be affected, probably, from what I see from the statistics, perhaps in the exceptional situations. Perhaps there are situations out there in which we have been frustrated in terms of making sure we keep the public safe, but we are tied perhaps to some agreements, some rules, or some binding policies that haven't allowed us to do that in the past.
Is that a fair assessment of the terms of the general landscape of these changes to this law?