I appreciate you bringing up that example, because one of the issues we've been studying as a committee, and moving forward with consensus on, is in regard to sexual offenders and how they move around and how they commit their crimes in various jurisdictions right around the world, with victims then having to find out that these people are back in their midst without any notice. These are some of the most horrific people in the world, who attack children and our families.
When my colleagues across the table say it's not good to expand the powers of a minister or ministry to be able to deal with these horrific situations when they occur, they are not regular occurrences. They are not the people who get charged with drug offences in Mexico or some place. At least, I don't believe they are; maybe I should concur with you on that.
I'm thinking that what this legislation allows us to do is to place some very common sense tests on whether or not these people should be allowed back in the country that, under the current law, ties the hands of the people making those decisions. That's why we're asking for these revisions. Am I off base in stating what I've just stated?