One of the problems that I see, from my party's point of view, is when there is just a slashing across the board of 5%, that sounds good in theory, but when you drill into it, that presumes there's 5% to cut. It presumes that there's 5% of fat.
I mean, if you have 100 police officers in a detachment and you need 120 of them, and you're underserviced and they say, “Well, cut 5%, cut the 5% you need the least”, they can do that. You can identify which five of the hundred you don't need, but it's still going to represent an unwarranted cut that's going to hurt service.
That's the analogy I have in my mind. Is that a fair analogy to what you're seeing here with CBSA officers being cut?