I can assure you it's certainly plausible that there could be victims in both countries, and it wouldn't take a whole lot of common sense to see that coming in straightforwardly. Pedophiles would be a great example.
I was talking to a victim of crime today and I asked her what her thoughts were on this bill. I mentioned the fact that the safety of any person in Canada who is a victim would be taken into consideration, the safety of any member of the offender's family, the case of an offender who has been convicted of an offence against the family member, the safety of a child, and she thought those were all great suggestions, and that the minister has the ability to determine whether or not a convicted felon in another country has the ability to come back to this country based on some of these points. She thought that was a great piece to have in there, so the minister could have a chance to stand up to the victims.
Is there anything, Mr. Calarco, that you would have against the minister standing up for the victims?