I realize that, if there's a charter right.
I see Mr. Conroy wants to comment, but I want to move to.... One of the reasons I'm concerned about this is not just theory. The Dwayne Grant case was a decision of then Minister Van Loan. The Federal Court said the decision seemed “inconsistent and arbitrary, and therefore it lacks transparency”. Mr. Van Loan rejected the unanimous advice of senior officials who recommended transfer.
In the Getkate case--one of yours, Mr. Conroy--then Minister Day, a different minister of this government, found that the applicant represented a threat to national security, even though Canadian prison officials had advised him there was not a shred of evidence of that.
I'm wondering how you feel about there being concrete examples of cases where ministers have already started to try to make decisions based on an absence of evidence or an absence of judicial process.