Thank you.
I'm sorry I wasn't at the presentation made by the minister. I apologize if this question was asked, but on page 9 of the minister's presentation there is the statement that the bill “affirms the fact that a person's criminal record will be kept separate and apart, but makes clear that the record has not been erased”.
I don't understand how that could be done. How can that be accomplished? It seems there are two competing principles here. How can you, in legislation, guarantee that a person's record will be kept separate but not erased? How can that be accomplished?