That's a good question.
I'm not exactly sure how one classifies and categorizes them, but these offences are almost the initiating offences. I don't know if you remember the debate on the animal cruelty legislation, where people said we had to tighten up the animal cruelty legislation because that cruelty is an indication of, let's say, a child being very disturbed and able to commit very difficult and dangerous offences down the road.
The types of sexual offences like obscene phone calls and voyeurism can in fact be a good indicator of where individuals are going if they are not properly supervised and stopped. That's why I think it's important, and that's why the legislation in this case still recognizes the opportunity to grant a record suspension where there is no child victim, or in cases where they are close in age or there is no position of trust or issue of authority.
I don't know if the term is predicate offences, but I'm referring to the offences that move someone along the continuum. That's why it's important.