Thank you very much.
On Korea, it is an institute affiliated with the Government of Korea, which naturally is noticed by we independent scholars. They did estimate that part of the benefit was that their Seoul summit attracted, first 10,000, and then the subsequent estimate was 15,000, visitors.
Typically that's when most people do the benefits--as if it were just another service club convention in the city. The analysis we've done selectively over several years really looks at the international media coverage, at whether it is favourable, neutral, or negative, and then attaches how much money you would have to pay to buy that. Of course, the high point for us was Peter Jennings' coverage on ABC News in 1988.
I think more importantly than that...and I did make reference to the Toronto terms on debt relief. That is a phrase that is talked about in development circles to this day. So it is the city, but the city associated as a sharing and caring place. In the case of Toronto, we haven't done comparable international media analysis, but we do know from selective work following the Toronto summit that the image of Toronto was not as firm as for the other great cities where summits had been held.
By the time we get to Toronto, it was not regarded as one of the world's leading financial capitals. So that is one of the opportunities to show. If the summit works on financial stability, the core founding mission of the G-20, then there's a consonance between what Toronto is now and why the world needs Toronto and its summit for that.