Thank you.
I know that I only have a moment left. This one is just quickly to Mr. Kirton. I hope that maybe I'll hear from the other two gentlemen a little later on.
Mr. Kirton, it's fair to say that we probably substantially disagree on a lot of what you had to say. Take maternal health, just as an example: it's reallocated dollars. This isn't new money. It's money being taken away from other departments and CIDA, taken away from other priorities, and the amount of money that Canada committed was less than was spent on the entire 72 hours. I don't share the heralding of that as a major accomplishment. I think it's good. I think it's good that it did something, but it's bad that it took it away from other things.
I have a question that is more on going forward and taking a look at the lessons from what happened here in the spending of money on infrastructure and what we saw happen with protesters. Would it not make sense, instead of always randomly selecting locations, to have a few designated locations where we could invest in permanent infrastructure, where we could have established protocols on the chain of command and on how to deal with protesters, where they could protest...to have these things prearranged and pre-agreed to? Would this sort of thing make sense to you?