Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you all for being with us today.
Thank you very much for sharing your opinion with us. It appears pretty generalized.
It would seem that this bill is completely useless and unnecessary, and that there is a consensus on that. That is what I understood, and I agree.
It seems to us that this bill is reiterating several of the positions that were in the former Bill C-19. Am I correct in this, according to the legal minds? These were clauses that were integral elements of the Anti-terrorism Act, which we know expired in 2007.
Even the public safety minister's annual reports say that no investigative hearings have been held under these statutes and that there's no reported use of the provisions. Am I correct?