This particular legislation creates a chill because I think it undermines the civil liberties of all Canadians.
If you looked like a Japanese Canadian during the Second World War, with the broad proclamations from government--whether they named Japanese or not--you were going to feel that there was special scrutiny on you. That wasn't unreasonable, under the circumstances.
We also have seen, for example, security certificates. They were used almost exclusively on Muslim and Arab immigrants to this country. That's the history of it. If you say some legislation is not doing any harm because it hasn't been used, we have the example of the G-20. Second World War-type legislation was languishing on the books, and the chief of police asked for more power to make sure security was in place. We can see what kind of harm can be done when it is implemented.