So from your answer to the question and the comments we've heard from other witnesses, who have actually said this is a tool that law enforcement would benefit from, and that we'd perhaps be able to stop something from happening in its tracks because we'd be able to investigate on a different basis than the current law allows us to do, and in comparison to our other international partners or other western democracies, which, frankly, are under threat from terrorism....
We know this. We know that we need to have law enforcement that has all the tools available to it in its toolbox to be able to fight that war, and that our law as proposed today is far less onerous on the side of the personal rights or human rights issue. We have it far more balanced than the other western democracies, based on some of the things that are included in their current terrorist legislation. Am I correct in saying that?