Mr. Chairman, it doesn't work because if you leave it as is, we will be debating an amendment that is no good.
If you look at the wording, it will end up being: “[…] the offender's return to Canada […]”. That doesn't work. To add “after the transfer”, “while they are serving their sentence”, “will endanger public safety”, just doesn't make a proper sentence in French. It doesn't work.
Mr. Holland should have withdrawn his amendment so that we could debate Mr. Davies' amendment and make a subamendment to deal with the return. What we're adding here is: “the offender's return to Canada, after the transfer, while they are serving their sentence”.