I am absolutely convinced that that is what they think, but I completely disagree with them. Their view is that a bill cannot be amended except by changing a comma or verb tense or correcting a spelling error. That is not my view.
If, for example, it is decided that the sentence for a particular offence should be 14 years, whereas I believe it should be seven years, I can move an amendment. That may be contrary to the stated purpose, but it is within the scope of the bill under consideration. In any case, being familiar with the way it works in other legislatures, I can tell you that I know that is the process which is followed, and it is more logical, because otherwise, there is no longer any point to clause-by-clause consideration.