Right now would be the time.
With the adoption of clause 5, this makes this again inadmissible. That's not the right word. “Nonsensical” would be the word that is used. Again, there are no sections 125 and 126.
But that still gives you the opportunity to speak to it, Mr. Davies.
Actually, no it doesn't. My decision is that this is now inadmissible because of those.... It can't even be put. So unless there is a challenge....