I've tried to allow everyone at the table just to get through the rounds of questions. If we start dividing it into two, one of the issues is where the officials will fit in. If we're going to split it at all, one argument would be that the officials should be the first round, and we don't have a lot of government officials. One official is actually waiting just for clause-by-clause consideration; she will hold off for that, and Mr. Sapers, the correctional investigator, would be by himself, so if we started splitting it, we would have three panels.
For that reason, I just asked Mr. Sapers about it. It's not usually the way it is done and I know it has inconvenienced him, but he appears willing to be at the table and to present, so the choice isn't necessarily between one and two. It may be between one and three.