Thank you.
I think the problem the member illustrates is her concern that people feel they are safe. We're not only concerned about their feeling safe, but are also actually concerned about them being safe. That I think is the distinction between the NDP and my government. We actually take measures that increase public safety, that will result in people feeling safe, and we do not simply say we're going to do something that is ineffective, that is wasteful in terms of money, because we think you might feel safe. It's irresponsible to go down that road.
There are many more cost-effective measures that we can take to ensure that crime is reduced, and we are taking those. I mentioned some of those in my speech and opening remarks, and we are committed to doing that, including in Bill C-10.
Again, the member talks about the issue of the classification. This has nothing to do with the classification of firearms; this has to do with the registry of non-restricted firearms. If the member has a concern about classification, about whether a firearm should be restricted or prohibited rather than unrestricted, that's another issue. She should address that in legislation or a motion, or elsewhere. Again, this has nothing to do with the classification.
You see, Mr. Chair, the NDP is trying to confuse the issues of registration, licensing, classification, and to jumble all of that up to make people feel safe.