If I'm not mistaken, there are two parts to your question.
First, the presentation I gave here this morning dealt with our federal public policy system for managing government information. We rely on the national archivist to determine the retention period and schedules for the destruction of government records. To perform this job, he relies on the expertise of all the people involved and on various criteria. In my opinion, in terms of the development of public policies, it would set a bad precedent to remove the archivist's responsibility for managing information under this bill.
Second, I will talk about section 67(1) of the Access to Information Act. As you say, I obviously don't think that this act would be infringed. As a legal expert, you must know that this act cannot be infringed if there is a law providing that such actions are legal. I don't think that section 67(1) would be at issue in these circumstances.