To your first question, yes, it was only Newfoundland that stipulated that to go out, one required treatment. That was for early release from prison. That's how it was used. They were saying, “We'll let you out earlier on the condition that you wear the bracelet and attend this intensive program”. That's what happened there.
In our analysis of the three provinces, our sample size was over 200, and there was no effect in reduced recidivism, on average, across the three provinces, but when we broke it down and looked just at Newfoundland, we were able to pinpoint why there was reduced recidivism. Was it because they happened to be wearing the bracelet or because they took the treatment? Our answer was that it was because they took the treatment. Just wearing the bracelet didn't have any effect.
Some may argue that maybe these people should have been released without the bracelet; you could have saved some more money and just put them in that program.