No, I think that England and Wales is a good crucible for all the different uses of it. I think that we have used it across the board on the criminal justice system, meaning that we've used it on a very wide range of offenders, from people who have committed assaults and burglaries right through to people on parole who have committed murder and serious sex offences. They're subject to electronic monitoring at the end of long custodial sentences. If they have been deemed suitable for release, the electronic monitoring simply becomes part of an early release or parole release package. I think we've been fairly thorough and eclectic in our use of electronic monitoring in England and Wales.
Scotland, for example, doesn't use it for bail and Scotland has never experimented with GPS tracking. It only uses electronic monitoring as a stand-alone community penalty. It also uses it as an early release mechanism. Different countries have made different political choices as to how to use electronic monitoring, according to what they perceive their penal problems to be.