No, I should clarify. It would not necessarily be a case that absolutely no escorted temporary absences...that it would not be used. It's possible to use it. Again, you yourself mentioned the discretion we have under the proposed legislation.
In the two examples you've brought up, there is actually a broader question as to whether those individuals should have been out on an ETA or any kind of temporary absence. But minimally, for unescorted temporary absences going to specific locations, we are more than likely probably going to use those all the time. Escorted ones will be based on a risk/need assessment, and the warden will have the authority to make the decision as to whether that condition will be applied to that kind of temporary absence.