We've tested the reliability of the technology, but we don't really know. Intuition and experience would tell us that what you're saying makes sense and that there's a good probability it will reduce recidivism through the greater interaction with the parole officer and so on, but that's not what we were testing here. We weren't testing that. We weren't testing recidivism.
You said before that it would allow us to know if someone who has a drinking problem was going to a bar or if someone who has a gambling problem was going to a casino. Is it that precise? Is the technology that precise? It seems to my mind that it would tell you the general area the person was in, but the person could be at the barbershop or at the bar next door—you just wouldn't know.