Thank you very much, Mr. Chair, and to the witnesses, thank you for appearing.
I have a couple of quick questions, so if you don't mind and it's possible, could you give succinct answers?
In my previous occupation I was a court officer for two different jurisdictions. About 40% to 60% of the charges at one time in one of the courts were breaches of court orders. Most of them were related to recognizance offences for which you would provide a product—in other words, a bracelet or alcohol device, that sort of thing.
I thought there was a very appropriate and positive use for your equipment until some of our witnesses came before this committee. By the way, I haven't given up on that thought.
However, here's the problem that I have. I have a GPS. Most of us have a GPS in our cars. They're pretty good to within, I would say, 30 feet, or maybe even 40 feet, yet the witnesses tell us that with some of the technology, studies reported 40% to 60% false indications that a person had gone beyond the limits of where they should go.
I wonder if you have some answers as to why these types of products, which you may or may not lease, would give those types of inaccuracies. Could you explain that, for us to have some kind of reliance on why we should do business with you?