Assuming that is true, that you can't make your family and your spouse your jailer—and I guess we'll have to have that debate some other time—why would anybody consent to be released if one of the conditions was the GPS? It appears to me that the GPS wasn't the problem. The problem was they didn't want to be jailed with their spouse and their family. That's what made their release problematic. It wasn't the device that made it problematic; it was who was jailing them.
On March 6th, 2012. See this statement in context.