Again, I think the cost savings from using EM technology have yet to be realized. That won't be realized until you go beyond one pilot in terms of a broader application of the technology to the offender population and then conduct such an examination.
You had mentioned a number of technical challenges with the EM experience for us in the early days. That was part of the pilot, to test that capacity. We looked at that technology and learned much during our pilot experience.
If you look at whether or not the goal was to have a direct impact on recidivism, it was not intended to. We don't see EM as having a direct impact on recidivism per se, but more as a supervisory tool, in addition to our ability to integrate this with other things we do that we know work well for those who require it.
Again, it will be an issue of selection, matching the appropriate strategy for managing that offender in the community and providing what we are ultimately looking for, the reintegration or the public safety dividend, shall we say.