I'm trying to reconcile something. You mentioned that in some cases this can be crueler than detention, yet our previous witness from Correctional Service Canada said the only way the electronic monitoring works in some conditions is that the consequence of a breach of one or more of the conditions of the electronic monitoring is a return to detention. The threat of a return to detention is what these individuals are fearing and why they are maintaining the conditions of their electronic monitoring. Can you reconcile that for me? It seems as if certainly for your clients and the individuals that Correctional Service Canada was following in its pilot project, the threat of detention was there and they chose electronic monitoring over detention. Can you reconcile that?
On March 6th, 2012. See this statement in context.