Our time is up, but I will read to you....
We have had the benefit of hearing some of what were vexatious complaints, in the opinion of Ms. James, who moved this bill. The definition that she gave, and which the commissioner is directed by in his directive, is as follows:
Vexatious or not made in good faith: where the decision maker concludes on the balance of probabilities that the overriding purpose of the complaint or grievance is: (a) to harass; (b) to pursue purposes other than a remedy for an alleged wrong; or (c) to disrupt or denigrate the complaint and grievance process.
There still is a certain latitude that they have. There is a decision they're going to have to make. But it is confined to the question whether it is harassment--is this a harassing--