Yes—whereas the person in the correctional facility doesn't have that option, really. I guess they have to deal with it, however much time that takes, and then if the inmate is not satisfied, he or she can appeal it and so on.
Essentially, this legislation seems to be trying to give the people inside the correctional facility the same option that you enjoy, which is to ignore a complaint that is vexatious. Now, it's quite possible that your judgment about whether it's vexatious or not is a better judgment because you do this full time, but essentially it seems to be trying to build a flexibility into the system.
My concern is that a vexatious complainant may have a legitimate complaint from time to time, and I'm just not so sure that, within the institution, the people dealing with these complaints have maybe the training or the ability in other ways to really weed out what is a threat to life, liberty, and security, and what is a vexatious complaint.
I know the intent of the bill is to still allow a vexatious complainant to be able to be heard if it's a serious matter, but do you think that within the institutions these decisions could be made wisely and uniformly across institutions in Canada?