I'm not asking you to speak for the committee. I'm just saying that the committee, like every committee in the House of Commons, can bring things forward.
In other words, if the opposition chose to make leave to the committee to have something happen, it would happen in committee, just as it would in this committee. I wouldn't see where the government, having made a commitment—and the blues will reflect that commitment to do so.
If I can go a little bit further on the difference between legislation and regulation, I would think that if I were the opposition, I would much rather something be in regulation, because it's much easier to change. Once it's enshrined in legislation, it must come, therefore, before the House, whereas in regulation it can be changed much more easily. It facilitates change in that way.
So I really think it's of benefit to do that, and furthermore, it meets with Mr. Sapers' own evidence before this committee that he believes these matters are better dealt with under regulation.