I'll summarize.
Dealing with the other heads for recovery, paragraphs 78.1(1)(b) and 78.1(1)(c), the picture is less clear, because a crown attorney is party to the proceedings in which restitution and victim surcharge orders are made. Is this sufficient knowledge to consider that Her Majesty in right of Canada has been put on notice and to allow moneys to be diverted from awards? It's not clear to us at all.
When we arrive at paragraph (d), which concerns judgments in civil courts, it becomes much less obvious that this can be done. These orders are not registered with anybody, and no mechanism has been proposed—