I'm not sure that would sort out the ambiguity because there isn't any ambiguity in terms of the amount that is owed with respect to a surcharge, restitution of family law order, and so on. Those amounts have already been determined. If a court is then awarding an amount to an offender because there has been some loss or damage to that offender, that amount has already been determined by a court. Those various amounts are not in dispute.
I take it the dispute you are referring to is when the offender simply doesn't want those payments to be made to his creditors.