It seems to me that what you're saying in regard to this bill being a bit vague is that we have to clear up the path, the money, from a court order that benefits the offender. We have to clarify the trail of that money: where it goes, who's going to manage it, and who's going to distribute it to the people listed in the ranking of creditors. It that what you're saying?
On May 8th, 2012. See this statement in context.