Right. You make a good point there, and as a former front-line guy, I think the concern is always that this discipline is going to be meted out at the lowest possible level to the lowest possible level. This act does speak to accountability and discipline that ranges right up to the highest levels of the RCMP.
I guess my vision would be that if a supervisor wasn't meting out discipline in an appropriate fashion, then they themselves would be accountable for discipline. If somebody failed to act upon that, they would be accountable as well, so it wouldn't always fall down and be applied to the front-line officers who, I'm guessing—and please tell me—would be the people you're hearing most from as those with the greatest level of concern about the range within which we play with discipline. Would that be accurate?