If I could add to that, I think that's part of the scenario with the 1988 act: the process was never looked at as what we have today. But it has been abused. I'm not saying there were built-in delays, but there were no expedited measures or timelines, and we're now stuck with a seven-year process.
With regard to this act, if we stay the person's wages and stuff, we may not have that ability to say, yes, today it's going to be two years or two months; in 10 years, it might be delayed to seven years again.
There have to be some timelines, as Abe said, built into the process, so that it's effective and timely.