Let's say you had to improve the ERC, to turn it into the ideal organization as you envision it. I understand that you endeavour, on the basis of facts, to be as impartial as possible and to represent everyone, a bit like a tribunal. It's great to present the facts. But you don't really have any power; all you can do is make recommendations.
When you are doing your job and the facts lead you to determine that a problem exists with a member, isn't it discouraging that all you can do is make recommendations?