We may well be missing something here, but there doesn't seem to be a problem in terms of articulating what ought to constitute a violation. I'm not sure changes would be necessary. Again, it's the whole business of deciding on appropriate dispositions.
It's two things. First is to decide whether or not something should be dealt with in a formal manner. Second, if it turns out through the investigative process at the hearings that there has been a violation, that there is some assurance that certain kinds of penalties will be in place to reflect the seriousness of the act.
Again, if there is one thing that's glaring about cases historically it's that there has been a never-ending effort in the past to minimize the seriousness of offences through the way in which they're dealt with, and to minimize them again through the kinds of penalties that are handed out. I don't think any reasonable outsider could look at the penalties that are awarded and think for a second that they in any way reflect what should be given as a disposition to anyone, let alone a police officer.