I think those are the—[Technical Difficulty—Editor]
It is important for the commission to be able to identify a pattern and then initiate an investigation. I don't think those reviews should be subject to availability of resources or other investigations.
I can give you an example. In Toronto recently, relating to the G-20, the Ontario Independent Police Review Director decided to undertake a systemic review even as he was dealing with individual complaints. At the same time there were a couple of other reviews going on, such as by the Ombudsman of Ontario and by the Toronto Police Services Board, through an independent reviewer. What we found was that each of these reviews brought out different pieces of information. They did not conflict with one another and they produced a very rich array of findings that was very beneficial. I don't think there should be restrictions.
The other concern I had is that sometimes the spectre of criminal investigation can be used to stop or deter such reviews from happening forever. I have faced that personally in Toronto, where a similar argument has been used to stop some very significant reviews from taking place in the public interest. Those criminal investigations will never be concluded, so those reviews will never take place. We have to worry about the impact of these restrictions.