I'll refer that to our legislative clerk.
Do you want to speak to that, Clerk, or...?
Basically, the counsel here again is that when you bring forward a bill and it's passed, it receives a royal recommendation. There is a royal recommendation set out for the government bill, but any amendment to that bill that involves the expenditure of money would need another royal recommendation, and consequently that would make the amendment inadmissible.
Do you think that's a sufficient explanation?
Mr. Garrison.