Just for correction, it's not quite true to say that the provisions have never been used in the first five years. Their use was attempted once in the investigative hearing in the Air India case. That's why it went to the Supreme Court of Canada. Once the Supreme Court of Canada made a decision, some 18 months later, by then the crown prosecutor indicated he didn't need to get the evidence from this witness anymore. I think he obtained it from some other source.
On the question about safeguards, that's a question for this committee to decide. This bill has more safeguards than exist under the normal criminal process, as the minister indicated.
Do you need more? That's really a question for the committee to answer.