If the judge is still of the opinion, or a second judge or another judge is of the opinion, that the conditions are necessary in order to prevent a terrorist activity, then that situation still exists. Just because 12 months or 11 months have expired doesn't all of a sudden mean the person is no longer a threat or the person should not be kept under conditions. It really becomes a factual situation. One would hope that over a period of time the threat would have lessened as a result of the imposition of the conditions.
Remember, the recognizance may not necessarily mean that this individual is the threat or the major perpetrator. These may be individuals who were involved in providing material support. By this period of time, other things may have happened. The police may have actually gained enough evidence to arrest the principal perpetrators in the interim.
It's geared toward prevention. It's not geared toward prosecution or investigation.