Okay, thank you.
I have one more question.
It says in the bill that testimony from the investigative proceedings can't or must not be used against a witness, but the minister did indicate that in certain cases it could be. He used perjury as an example. Does that concern you?
Maybe Mr. Gilmour might want to answer. Does it concern you as a lawyer, or someone more familiar with the law? Is it problematic in any way?