I want to follow up with something you raised a few minutes ago. I believe it was derivative use immunity, which is a term I just learned today. I think I understand what it means. The question would arise, then, of whether investigative hearings are really a good idea. In other words, will they impede prosecution of people who might be guilty of involvement in terrorism if anything that's revealed in this cannot be used against them? Will it not make prosecutions of those people more difficult?
On November 19th, 2012. See this statement in context.