Again, it would obviously depend upon the circumstances and the facts of individual cases. I gave one example to Mr. Scarpaleggia. You might have the parents contact law enforcement and say their son or daughter is getting on a plane and to join some sort of terrorist activity or terrorist group in some other country. There are many ways this information could come to law enforcement agents. They are carrying on a continuing effort to protect Canadians, so there are an infinite number of ways they would get the information that a person is leaving to join a terrorist activity or to assist in facilitating it. The offence is drawn broadly, in the sense that it captures the kind of activity.
What you're doing as well is sending out the correct message that in this country we don't tolerate that activity. It is unacceptable for somebody to leave this country to participate in terrorist activity somewhere else in the world. Yes, the tool is there to intercept that individual, but it also sends out the message—and I think it's the correct message—that Canadians find it unacceptable for anybody to leave this country to participate in criminal or terrorist activities.
Again, I think it's one more step that we can and should have implemented in the laws of this country.