When we bring in legislation, we bring it in based on Canadian experience and Canadian analysis of the threats we face. That said, Britain has undergone a couple of revisions. There are provisions with respect to the detention of an individual. That's not the focus here; our focus is on investigation. We're not in the business of trying to imprison somebody we want to question. That's not what we're all about. I'm not suggesting that anybody else is, but if you look at the tone of a number of the pieces of legislation.... In the British example, a person can be detained for, I believe, 14 days. Fourteen days is the newest incarnation of that measure. I believe it was 28 days not that long ago. When you analyze this bill, you'll see that very quickly we have the individual before courts. Again, the focus is not to punish somebody in an investigative hearing; it's to get information that may assist in preventing terrorist activity at home or abroad.
We have a look at what Australia and other countries that have similar legal systems do. It's helpful, but ultimately it has to be a Canadian answer, a Canadian experience, and Canadian legislation. That's what we're all about, and this legislation is consistent with that approach.