Thank you.
Thank you very much for that explanation, actually. I think you've provided a real “plain English” explanation that will resonate with Canadians about how that's applied and how we go about putting that provision in place.
Maybe I could get you to do the same with the provision for a recognizance; I think that has a possibility to stem a little bit of confusion. When somebody goes before the courts and a recognizance is negotiated, maybe you could give us some background on what sort of condition could be applied, based on your years of experience.
If somebody is involved in computer crime, for example, or computer terrorism, and using that as a networking system to communicate, could a reasonable condition be to stop them from communicating with the utilization of technology? Maybe you could give us some background on that so that we can understand the kinds of conditions that might be or could possibly be imposed and what would be reasonable and what would not be reasonable in terms of conditions.