My answer to that would be yes.
As I explained in my introduction, we take a risk-based approach to the work we do and to deciding where we need to concentrate our resources to interdict people and groups from entering Canada that may threaten Canada and Canadians.
When we talk about a risk-based approach—and my colleague is more of an expert in this than I am—we mean a threat. There are any number of potential threats to Canada and Canadians that could be identified. When we say “risk”, we mean “threat” placed within the context of probability and impact.
Now there are many threats that are highly probable but would be of low impact. There are many threats that are extremely improbable but would be extremely high-impact; 9/11 would be an example of that.
So we work on a constant basis to reassess threats and to place them within a risk-profiling paradigm to identify where we need to place our resources to best protect Canada and Canadians.