I just have one question.
Based on comments that Mr. Norlock made earlier, and in the follow-up by Assistant Commissioner Malizia.... Both of you used the term “preventative”.
In my experience, as a police board member and as a city councillor, preventative measures were more of what Mr. Irwin was talking about. What both of you were talking about, when you used the term, was attempts to disrupt terrorist activities rather than remove causes. Preventative usually looks at the causes, in my experience in policing. There is that intermediate category that often becomes problematic for policing in terms of disruption of activities. You see it in the controversies about organized crime—do you participate, do you not participate?
I wonder if you see a distinction between the preventative and the disruptive, whether there's a useful distinction we can make there.