Yes, as indicated previously, the proposed amendment would be problematic for the same reasons.
How does one prove knowledge of what another person intends? To us, this amendment makes it far more difficult. Moreover, the harbouring and concealing offence addresses the situation where the harbouring or concealing is not done for the purpose of enabling a person to escape, but rather must be committed for the purpose of enabling the person to facilitate or carry out any terrorist activity.
This amendment would have the effect of further narrowing the ambit of the offence, which already, again, has a very narrow and precise focus. We do not believe that the further narrowing is warranted given the purpose element of the offence.
For these reasons, we are opposed to this amendment.