My answer is that there are always going to be those new things in crime. That's reality. There's going to be always only so much money.
I think it's a refocus. The refocus should be on evidence and outcomes, and those things that we do well that make sense to our bottom line we need to continue to do. As for those things that we don't do well and don't make sense to our bottom line, we need to get out of them and reinvest. Before it's new money, it needs to be reinvestment.
One of the things we have to look at.... I'm not a big proponent of private security. I know they have a role; I'm not so sure the role is policing, but there is a low-risk model of policing in which a lot of agencies are using special constables at a reduced rate to do specific police duties, which in essence should free up some end money to reinvest in those areas that we need to keep up.
Police have to operate cradle to grave. They have to be good at all ends of the spectrum. To be good at all ends of the spectrum, you need to focus the expertise on those particular areas to keep up with them. To get back to the comment we had here, that's why I think when we focus on other areas and have police involved in mental health strategies and in educational outcomes, we truly do have a community safety program.